家电科技 ›› 2023, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (zk): 507-510.doi: 10.19784/j.cnki.issn1672-0172.2023.99.114

• 第六部分 标准分析与检测 • 上一篇    下一篇

破壁机微生物检测方法研究

赵念思, 张川, 李晶, 李冬梅, 陈嘉肖   

  1. 美的集团股份有限公司,佛山市顺德区美的电热电器制造有限公司 广东佛山 528311
  • 出版日期:2023-12-12 发布日期:2023-12-26
  • 通讯作者: 李晶,E-mail:jing1.li@midea.com。
  • 作者简介:赵念思,硕士学位。研究方向:烹饪饮食营养健康。地址:佛山市顺德区北滘镇美的全球创新中心2栋。E-mail:zhaons2@midea.com。

Study on microbial detection methods of high-speed blender

ZHAO Niansi, ZHANG Chuan, LI Jing, LI Dongmei, CHEN Jiaxiao   

  1. Midea Group Co., Ltd, FoShan ShunDe Midea Electrical Heating Appliances Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Foshan 528311
  • Online:2023-12-12 Published:2023-12-26

摘要: 为了明确破壁机在烹饪后微生物的测试方法,采用菌落总数法和标准菌人工污染法对破壁机杯体内的洁净度和除菌率分别进行了评估,并优化测试方法的前处理方法。结果表明,破壁机在烹饪后的72 h内菌落总数可达107 CFU,其中杯口壁和杯盖是长菌最严重的两处部位;对比了制浆法与不制浆法的标准菌人工污染法对除菌率测试结果的影响,制浆法的除菌率偏低,但其平行性好,数据稳定性更高。优化后的除菌率测试方法更加能够反映出实际生活场景中破壁机的清洁效果。

关键词: 除菌率, 菌落总数, 大肠杆菌, 测试方法研究

Abstract: To determine the test method of microorganisms in the blender after cooking. The total microbial count and standard bacteria artificial contamination method were used to evaluate the cleanliness and bacterial eliminating rate in the blender, and the pretreatment method of the test method was optimized. The results showed that the total microbial count reached 107 CFU in 72 h after cooking, and the top rim and lid of the blender were the two most serious places for microbial to grow. The influence of standard bacteria artificial contamination method on the test results of bacterial eliminating rate was compared between soymilk making method and non-soymilk making method. The soymilk making method had a low bacterial eliminating rate, however, its parallelism was good and the data stability was higher. The optimized bacterial eliminating rate method can better reflect the cleanliness of blender in real life scenes.

Key words: Bacterial eliminating rate, Total microbial count, Escherichia coli, Research on testing methods

中图分类号: