纤维素纤维织物表面去污机制与方法论述

doi:10.19784/j.cnki.issn1672-0172.2025.01.009

Abstract

Abstract: The stain removal on the surface of cellulose fiber fabric is an important index to evaluate the performance of washing equipment. Changes in stain removal processes and removal mechanisms as a theoretical basis for improving the cleaning performance of washing equipment, combining relevant research reports to discuss the factors affecting stain removal and the mechanisms of these factors. It summarizes the relevant theories of stain removal and the interrelationships between various factors, explaining the role of these theories in the decontamination process of cellulose fabric surfaces. Finally, scientifically and systematically suggested to use cellulose derivatives as surfactants, auxiliary agents, or finishing agents in the detergent formulation to promote the decontamination effect of cellulose surfaces.

Key words: Cellulosic textiles, Stains, Surfactants, Cleaning mechanism

CLC Number:

TM925
TB14

ZHANG Yongqiang, BIAN Guolong, YUAN Wei, GAO Feifei, LI Yimin, HAO Shilong. The mechanism and methodology of cellulosic textiles surface stain removal[J]. Journal of Appliance Science & Technology, 2025, 0(1): 60-67.

References

[1] 孙雨苗, 丁雪梅. 家庭洗涤中影响洗净率的因素探讨[J]. 家电科技, 2019(02): 36-38.
[2] Haewon, Chung, Hyun, et al. Grouping of various stains to develop programs for a front-loading washer[J]. Fibers and Polymers, 2017, 18(05): 1000-1010.
[3] 周澳, 刘蓉, 吴雄英, 等. 洗衣机用污渍布制备标准对比研究[J]. 中国洗涤用品工业, 2022(07): 44-49.
[4] Ginn M, Kinney F, Harris J.Effect of cotton substrate characteristics upon surfactant adsorption[J]. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 1961, 38(03): 138-143.
[5] Ahjin, Lee, Moon, et al. The effects of mechanical actions on washing efficiency[J]. Fibers and Polymers, 2008, 9(01): 101-106.
[6] Yun C, Cho Y, Park C.Washing efficiency and fabric damage by beating and rubbing movements in comparison with a front-loading washer[J]. Textile Research Journal, 2017, 87(06): 708-714.
[7] Muir A, McKeown P, Li Y, et al. The removal of food fat based soils during the washing of fabrics[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2014, 91(09): 1602-1613.
[8] Van der Donck J. Compression of wet textile[J]. Enside Surfactant Detergents, 1997, 34(05): 322-326.
[9] Van der Donck, J. The influence of flow through textile layers on soil removal[J]. Tenside Surfactant Detergents, 1999, 36(04): 222-224.
[10] Yun C, Park S, Park C.The effect of fabric movement on washing performance in a front-loading washer[J]. Textile Research Journal, 2013, 83(17): 1786-1795.
[11] Yun C, Park C.The effect of fabric movement on washing performance in a front-loading washer. II: Under various physical washing conditions[J]. Textile Research Journal, 2015, 85(03): 251-261.
[12] Akcabay D, Dowling D, Schultz W.Clothes washing simulations[J]. Computers Fluids, 2014, 100: 79-94.
[13] Chanwattanakit J, Scamehorn J, Sabatini D, et al.Laundry detergency of solid non-particulate soil or waxy solids: Part I. Relation to oily soil removal above the melting point[J]. Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, 2017, 20(04): 815-830.
[14] Lu C, Rosencrance S, Swales D, et al.Dry strength: Strategies for stronger paper[M]. Make Paper Products Stand Out. Strategic Use of Wet End Chemical Additives, M. A. Hubbe and S. Rosencrance, S. (eds.) TAPPI Press, Atlanta, GA, Ch.7, 2020: 155-196.
[15] Kalak T, Cierpiszewski R.Correlation analysis between particulate soil removal and surface properties of laundry detergent solutions[J]. Textile Research Journal, 2015, 85(18): 1884-1906.
[16] Hubbe M.Detachment of colloidal hydrous oxide spheres from flat solids exposed to flow. 3. Forces of adhesion[J]. Colloids and Surfaces, 1987, 25(2-4), 311-324.
[17] Obendorf S, Microscopy to define soil, fabric and detergent formulation characteristics that affect detergency: A review[J]. AATCC Review, 2004, 4(01): 17-23.
[18] Carroll B, Physical aspects of detergency[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A, 1993, 74(2-3): 131-167.
[19] Tongcumpou C, Acosta E, Quencer L, et al.Microemulsion formation and detergency with oily soils: III. Performance and mechanisms[J]. Surfactants and Detergents, 2005, 8(02): 147-156.
[20] Ren J, Shao J, Yu M, et al.Fluorescence analysis of detergency mechanisms of olive oil on single cotton fibers[J]. Eco-dyeing, Finishing and Green Chemistry, J. H. Shao and Q. G. Fan (eds.), series: Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 441: 691-694.
[21] Han H, Chung S, Kim J, et al.Mechanical and physiochemical contribution in removal of different soil types on cotton fabric[J]. Textile Research Journal, 2015, 85(19): 2009-2019.
[22] Tanthakit P, Ratchatawetchakul P, Chavadej S, et al.Palm oil removal from fabric using microemulsion-based formulations[J]. Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, 2010, 13(04): 485-495.
[23] Scheuing D, Hsieh J.Detergency of nonionic surfactants toward a solid hydrocarbon soil studied by FT-IR[J]. Langmuir, 1988, 4(06): 1277-1283.
[24] Kissa E.Wetting and detergency[J]. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 1981, 53(11): 2255-2268.
[25] Silva C, Azoia N, Martins M, et al.Molecular recognition of esterase plays a major role on the removal of fatty soils during detergency[J]. Journal of Biotechnology, 2012, 161(03): 228-234.
[26] Chanwattanakit J, Chavadej S.Laundry detergency of solid non-particulate soil using microemulsion-based formulation[J]. J. Oleo Sci., 2018, 67(02): 187-198.
[27] Rojvoranun S, Chadavipoo C, Pengjun W, et al.Mechanistic studies of particulate soil detergency: I. Hydrophobic soil removal[J]. Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, 2012, 15(03): 277-289.
[28] Chanwattanakit J, Scamehorn J, Sabatini D, et al.Laundry detergency of solid nonparticulate soil or waxy solids: Part II. Effect of the surfactant type[J]. Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, 2019, 22(03): 571-585.
[29] Kontturi E, Suchy M, Penttila P, et al.Amorphous characteristics of an ultrathin cellulose film[J]. Biomacromolecules, 2011, 12(03): 770-777.
[30] Yamane C, Aoyagi T, Ago M, et al.Two different surface properties of regenerated cellulose due to structural anisotropy[J]. Polym. J., 2006, 38(08): 819-826.
[31] Paria S, Manohar C, Khilar K, et al.Kinetics of adsorption of anionic, cationic, and nonionic surfactants[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2005, 44(09): 3091-3098.
[32] Simoncić B, Roman V.Wettability of cotton fabric by aqueous solutions of surfactants with different structures[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A, 2007, 292(2-3): 236-245.
[33] Arslan B, Colpan M, Ju X, et al.The effects of noncellulosic compounds on the nanoscale interaction forces measured between carbohydrate-binding module and lignocellulosic biomass[J]. Biomacromolecules, 2016, 17(05): 1705-1715.
[34] 付玉叶, 周存玲, 崔阅馨, 等. 污渍在不同纺织材料上黏附方式及洗净性能研究[J]. 家电科技, 2023(02): 47-51.
[35] Hernandez E, Mitrano D, Nowack B.Polyester textiles as a source of microplastics from households: A mechanistic study to understand microfiber release during washing[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2017, 51: 7036-7046.
[36] Sipponen M, Lange H, Crestini C, et al.Lignin for nano- and microscaled carrier systems: Applications, trends, and challenges[J]. ChemSusChem, 2019, 12(10): 2039-2054.
[37] Ou J, Zhao J.Modification of sodium lignosulfonate and evaluation of its potential use as detergent builders[J]. Journal of Wood Chemistry and Technology, 2017, 37(02): 99-109.
[38] Ou J, Kong Z, Yang R, et al.Synthesis of a lignin-based alcohol ether carboxylate surfactant and its application as cotton fiber detergent[J]. Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology, 2023, 44(04): 577-584.

The mechanism and methodology of cellulosic textiles surface stain removal

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 1

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10