家电科技 ›› 2022, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (1): 51-57.doi: 10.19784/j.cnki.issn1672-0172.2022.01.008

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

异味去除技术及评价方法研究

郭鑫, 王秀萍, 武凤玲, 魏伟, 劳春峰   

  1. 海尔智家生态平台超前创新中心 山东青岛 266101
  • 出版日期:2022-02-01 发布日期:2022-02-15
  • 作者简介:郭鑫,硕士。研究方向:场景下的空气标准、空气净化、空气质量控制。地址:山东省青岛市崂山区海尔路1号海尔工业园。E-mail:guoxin.aic@haier.com。

Research on odor removal technology and evaluation method

GUO Xin, WANG Xiuping, WU Fengling, WEI Wei, LAO Chunfeng   

  1. Advanced Innovation Center, Haier Smart Home ECO-Platform Qingdao 266101
  • Online:2022-02-01 Published:2022-02-15

摘要: 高质量的空气是国民健康的保障。在家庭环境中,室内往往由于通风不良、采光不足等问题,导致室内环境中有害物质的产生和积累,使空气质量下降的同时,直接或间接地损害人们的健康。以硫化氢气体为异味源,通过感官评价的方法,设计实验对比目前市面上常见的除异味技术,并总结了各自的优缺点。实验表明:光触媒及活性炭去除异味效果较为明显,负离子去除异味速度相对缓慢,而等离子在去除异味的同时产生副产物,需要平衡除味效果与副产物之间的关系,研究成果可为家电除异味功能的发展提供借鉴。

关键词: 异味, 感官评价, 光触媒, 活性炭, 负离子, 等离子

Abstract: High quality air is the guarantee of national health. In the domestic environment, problems such as poor ventilation and insufficient lighting often lead to the generation and accumulation of harmful substances in the indoor environment, which not only reduces the air quality, but also directly or indirectly damages people's health. Taking hydrogen sulfide gas as the odor source, through the method of sensory evaluation, experiments are designed to compare the current common odor removal technology on the market, and their advantages and disadvantages are summarized. The research results show that the effect of photocatalyst and activated carbon on odor removal is obvious, and the speed of anion removal is relatively slow. Plasma can produce by-products while removing odor, which needs to balance the relationship between odor removal effect and by-product control. The results can provide reference for the development of home appliances.

Key words: Unpleasant odor, Sensory evaluation, Photocatalyst, Activated carbon, Anion, Plasma

中图分类号: