家电科技 ›› 2021, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (zk): 414-417.doi: 10.19784/j.cnki.issn1672-0172.2021.99.098

• 第四部分 材料与零部件 • 上一篇    下一篇

超低成本冰箱包装底垫研究

陈冠锋, 蔡晓波, 李先刚   

  1. 合肥华凌股份有限公司 安徽合肥 230601
  • 发布日期:2021-12-22
  • 作者简介:陈冠锋,硕士。研究方向:冰箱结构。E-mail:510998101@qq.com。

Research on the ultra-low cost refrigerator packaging bottom cushion

CHEN Guanfeng, CAI Xiaobo, Li Xiangang   

  1. Hefei Hualing Co., Ltd. Hefei 230601
  • Published:2021-12-22

摘要: 随着市场原材料、人工成本等的上升,家电企业盈利受到挑战,因此,降低产品成本,提高产品竞争力及盈利能力成为重中之重。企业和研究机构降低产品成本方法一般是:方法一利用直接经验进行结构优化设计,再经过反复实验验证再优化的方法;方法二利用仿真软件拓扑结构实现轻量化的优化结构方案,最后结合实验验证;目前对于实验成本高及结构复杂的产品一般采用方法二,但是方法二仿真技术仅局限在单一密度产品的拓扑结构优化。于是,在这里提出了另一个降低产品成本的研究思路,主要是通过仿真分析对底垫缓冲性能做出强弱分析,确定高低密度分布区域,最大化底垫的低密度区域达到超低成本目的,然后利用跌落仿真实验对比前后差异确认可靠性,最后进行跌落实验验证确认最终的可行性验证。通过以上开发思路实现双密度包装底垫较之前重量优化约25.2%,同时优化掉昂贵的EPP镶嵌件,实现成本最大化,为后期多密度及更低成本产品开发提供研究思路。

关键词: 多密度, 跌落仿真分析, 包装材料, 缓冲性能

Abstract: With the rise of market raw materials and labor costs, the profitability of home appliance companies has been challenged, so reducing product costs, improving product competitiveness and profitability have become the top priority. The methods for enterprises and research institutions to reduce product costs are generally: Method 1, Use direct experience to optimize the design of the structure, and then optimize it after repeated experiments. Method 2, Use the simulation software topology to achieve a lightweight and optimized structure scheme, and finally verify it with experiments. At present, method 2 is generally used for products with high experimental cost and complex structure. However, the method 2 simulation technology is only limited to the topology optimization of a single-density product. Therefore, another research idea to reduce product cost is proposed here, which is mainly to analyze the strength of the cushion performance through simulation analysis, determine the high and low density distribution area, and maximize the low density area of the bottom cushion to achieve ultra-low cost And then use the drop simulation experiment to compare the difference before and after to confirm the reliability, and finally perform the drop experiment to confirm the final feasibility verification. Through the above development ideas, the weight of the dual-density packaging bottom pad is optimized by about 25.2% compared with the previous one. At the same time, the expensive EPP inserts are optimized to maximize the cost and provide research ideas for the later development of multi-density and lower-cost products.

Key words: Multi-density, Drop simulation analysis, Packaging materials, Cushion performance

中图分类号: